| Date | 7 September 1904 |
|---|---|
| Status | Olympic |
| Location | Physical Culture Gymnasium, Washington University, St. Louis |
| Participants | 9 from 4 countries |
It is believed that the fencing regulations used were those of the Amateur Fencing League of America, which was established in 1891 as the national governing body for fencing in the United States. If so, the maximum length of the foil blade was 34 inches (86 cm). The target area was the body, “within the limits bounded by the collar of the fencing jacket, the median line, the hip, and a line drawn from the hip to the posterior limit of the armpit, around the front of the arm and along the crest of the shoulder to the collar.” The “median line” referred to a vertical line running down the middle of the front of the torso, which meant that touches were valid only to the half of the torso on the side of the fencing arm. Touches to the other side of the torso were not valid. Touches to the back were also not valid.
As was common in Europe, the winner of a foil bout was not determined by the number of touches scored, but rather based on the evaluation by the judges. They would have been using a head judge and either two or four side judges for each of the bouts. The fencers bouted for four minutes of actual fencing time, switching sides after two. At the end of the bout, “Each judge without consulting his fellow judges shall award 100 points or any part thereof to each contestant at the end of the bout. The score shall be the average of the sum of the points obtained. The award of each judge shall be announced at the end of each bout.” The fencer whose average score was the highest was the winner of the bout. So, no touch counts are shown in the results because they were not used to determine the winners.
This had the largest field of any 1904 fencing event, with nine competitors, which required two preliminary pools to advance four fencers to the final round. There were also fencers from four nations – Cuba, Germany, Great Britain, and the United States. Cuba’s Ramón Fonst went undefeated, winning all four of his pool matches, and all three bouts in the final to win the gold medal. Fonst also won gold in St. Louis with the épée (having won with that weapon at the 1900 Olympics in Paris), and also won team foil. Albertson Van Zo Post won the silver medal, one of five fencing medals he won in St. Louis. He would also compete again at the 1912 Olympics for the United States but won no medals in Stockholm.
| Pos | Competitor | NOC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ramón Fonst | CUB | Gold | ||
| 2 | Albertson Van Zo Post | USA | Silver | ||
| 3 | Charles Tatham | USA | Bronze | ||
| 4 | Gustav Casmir | GER | |||
| 3 p1 r1/2 | Fitzhugh Townsend | USA | |||
| 3 p2 r1/2 | Wilfred Holroyd | GBR | |||
| 4 p1 r1/2 | Theodore Carstens | USA | |||
| 4 p2 r1/2 | Arthur Fox | USA | |||
| 5 p1 r1/2 | William Grebe | USA |
| Date | 7 September 1904 |
|---|---|
| Format | Top two finishers in each pool advanced to final. |
| Pos | Competitor | NOC | Bouts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ramón Fonst | CUB | 4-0 | ||
| 2 | Albertson Van Zo Post | USA | 3-1 | ||
| 3 | Fitzhugh Townsend | USA | 2-2 | ||
| 4 | Theodore Carstens | USA | 1-3 | ||
| 5 | William Grebe | USA | 0-4 |
| Match | Date/Time | Competitor | NOC | Result | Competitor | NOC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bout #1 | 07 Sep | Ramón Fonst | CUB | beat | Albertson Van Zo Post | USA | |
| Bout #2 | 07 Sep | Ramón Fonst | CUB | beat | Fitzhugh Townsend | USA | |
| Bout #3 | 07 Sep | Ramón Fonst | CUB | beat | Theodore Carstens | USA | |
| Bout #4 | 07 Sep | Ramón Fonst | CUB | beat | William Grebe | USA | |
| Bout #5 | 07 Sep | Albertson Van Zo Post | USA | beat | Fitzhugh Townsend | USA | |
| Bout #6 | 07 Sep | Albertson Van Zo Post | USA | beat | Theodore Carstens | USA | |
| Bout #7 | 07 Sep | Albertson Van Zo Post | USA | beat | William Grebe | USA | |
| Bout #8 | 07 Sep | Fitzhugh Townsend | USA | beat | Theodore Carstens | USA | |
| Bout #9 | 07 Sep | Fitzhugh Townsend | USA | beat | William Grebe | USA | |
| Bout #10 | 07 Sep | Theodore Carstens | USA | beat | William Grebe | USA |
| Pos | Competitor | NOC | Bouts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gustav Casmir | GER | 3-0 | ||
| 2 | Charles Tatham | USA | 2-1 | ||
| 3 | Wilfred Holroyd | GBR | 1-2 | ||
| 4 | Arthur Fox | USA | 0-3 |
| Match | Date/Time | Competitor | NOC | Result | Competitor | NOC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bout #1 | 07 Sep | Gustav Casmir | GER | beat | Charles Tatham | USA | |
| Bout #2 | 07 Sep | Gustav Casmir | GER | beat | Wilfred Holroyd | GBR | |
| Bout #3 | 07 Sep | Gustav Casmir | GER | beat | Arthur Fox | USA | |
| Bout #4 | 07 Sep | Charles Tatham | USA | beat | Wilfred Holroyd | GBR | |
| Bout #5 | 07 Sep | Charles Tatham | USA | beat | Arthur Fox | USA | |
| Bout #6 | 07 Sep | Wilfred Holroyd | GBR | beat | Arthur Fox | USA |
| Date | 7 September 1904 |
|---|---|
| Format | Round-robin pool. |
| Pos | Competitor | NOC | Bouts | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ramón Fonst | CUB | 3-0 | ||
| 2 | Albertson Van Zo Post | USA | 2-1 | ||
| 3 | Charles Tatham | USA | 1-2 | ||
| 4 | Gustav Casmir | GER | 0-3 |
| Match | Date/Time | Competitor | NOC | Result | Competitor | NOC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bout #1 | 07 Sep | Ramón Fonst | CUB | beat | Gustav Casmir | GER | |
| Bout #2 | 07 Sep | Ramón Fonst | CUB | beat | Charles Tatham | USA | |
| Bout #3 | 07 Sep | Ramón Fonst | CUB | beat | Albertson Van Zo Post | USA | |
| Bout #4 | 07 Sep | Albertson Van Zo Post | USA | beat | Charles Tatham | USA | |
| Bout #5 | 07 Sep | Albertson Van Zo Post | USA | beat | Gustav Casmir | GER | |
| Bout #6 | 07 Sep | Charles Tatham | USA | beat | Gustav Casmir | GER |